. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Nap Time!!!

Thursday, January 15, 2009
Details

The Daily Cal is confirming that Moghtader's suit was accepted:
Moghtader said the Judicial Council has agreed to hear the case and is expected to issue a ruling in the coming days.
How many days, is there a hearing, where is that hearing, etc. might be questions I would have liked an answer to, but meh. If anyone knows the answers to those questions, let me know.

(Update: Apparently there will be a hearing, though it hasn't been scheduled yet.)

Points awarded for this:
But Nathan Shaffer, one of the initiators of the petition, said that it was valid and that the election should take place.

"My position is that the petition wasn't vague," he said. "I think it should be ruled valid and the recall election should go through."
That's about as contentless as reporting gets. Why not just write "after reading Moghtader's accusation that the petition was vague, Shaffer said 'nuh uh!'"

Anyway, if there is a hearing or folks are writing briefs, as always, I'm available to help anyone on any side.

posted by Beetle Aurora Drake 1/15/2009 11:05:00 PM #
Comments (0)
. . .
Comments: Post a Comment


. . .