You heard it in my comment box first

Some argument:

"What happens is if you're marked absent for the first roll call, you're marked absent for the entire meeting," he said. (But) that's not true because I was there for the entire meeting."

That's Philip Kim, arguing that he should be marked present and thus not be removed from office. But since the Constitution defines attendance, and includes being present for the first roll call as part of attendance, I don't really see his point. Is he saying he was there for the roll call and didn't say he was when his name was called? Or that he said he did say so and nobody recorded it?

posted by Beetle Aurora Drake 4/09/2008 01:29:00 AM #
Comments (0)

. . .