Oooh

The Daily Cal has shifted its "profiles of candidates" approach to discussing offices. Now, after talking about the two major parties for each executive office, they just list the losers (third-parties) and pick one to say something about how being a third-party is good, but otherwise don't give them any chance to present their platform.

There's nothing necessarily wrong with the approach, though I'm curious about the reason for the decision.

posted by Beetle Aurora Drake 4/03/2008 08:38:00 AM #
Comments (1)

. . .

Comments:

I noticed this too. What a bunch of bullshit - they can bitch all they want now about how the SA & CS prove to be extremely flawed but not tell anyone about the alternatives, as (un)viable as they may be.

# posted by  Ben N. : 9:15 AM, April 03, 2008

 

Post a Comment