. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Nap Time!!!

Tuesday, April 01, 2008
Oh, there we go

So, after leaving it blank, we finally get around to Rae Einerson's answer:
This doesn't preclude SUPBERB from simultaneously going through the same routes as other groups to attain funds

- I apparently forgot to answer this one the first time around..and that's because I was thinking of the best way to basically say. Trust us.. we said we wouldn't ask for more money and all we have is our word. Tear it apart, say what you will but that's the truth.
Their word doesn't mean anything, because they're graduating eventually. And it's absolute bullshit to say "all we have is our word." They also have the language of the referendum. They could've written in a provision to the referendum which prohibited them from receiving both this funding and further funding. And they know that it's possible because the Squelch magazine did exactly what they say they can't do last year when writing their referendum.

Given that they lied about this, what worth does their "word" have?

posted by Beetle Aurora Drake 4/01/2008 11:33:00 PM #
Comments (1)
. . .
Comments:
that's actually really funny.
 
Post a Comment


. . .