very surprised. Kunert isn't running a serious campaign. Really shock about the AAVP endorsement. Christian is much more qualified than Carlo.
 

SQUELCH! is always the obvious choice.
 

They endorsed Carlo as a way to continue to get back at SA over the legal fees debacle.

Christian is obviously the better candidate, and he will get elected.
 

Their point would have been more effective with a "No Endorsement" for the top two slots. Endorsing Curtis with that kind article and Chad is just silly.

If it's a way to get back at SA, why did they endorse Curtis?
 

because if they had gone as far as not endorsing Curtis their bias would have been far too obvious.

Both Curtis and Christian are really good candidates, but they wouldn't endorse both.
 

I was surprised, but the Kunert endorsement article was well explained. Let's face it, he'd break up the SA-CS monotony and maybe actually get something done. He's got my vote.

P.S. de La Cruz? WTF.
 

Taking the ASUC seriously (AKA running a "serious" campaign) ought to be automatic disqualification for office. Clearly people like that are deluded.
 

If you tell Ben or David that they are still the model leaders of the ASUC, their egos may be visible from space.

OK, more visible.
 

An open letter to The Daily Cal, Berkeley Bloggers and other campus publications:

Please do not invoke the name of Ben Narodick. When you do this, someone tells him (or he has a Google Alert on his own name, whichever) and he proceeds to send me a link. I have been Berkeley blog-free for over a year now. I have a real job, I cannot afford to fall off the wagon. Please, for the love of all things holy, do not feed Ben's ego...it's gigantic.

Thank you.
 

you have to hand it to whoever wrote them, i didn't think it was possible to make a convincing argument for chad and he actually does
 

Not he. I've met he, she's really sweet!
 

are you kidding? I used to work with her at the DC and sweet is not the word. have you ever seen her mad?
 

"because if they had gone as far as not endorsing Curtis their bias would have been far too obvious.

Both Curtis and Christian are really good candidates, but they wouldn't endorse both."

Wow, that's a pretty intense conspiracy theory. I believe it was the poet Joe Rothberg who once said,
"Their candidates don't know shit / and when they lose elections they throw a fit
 

Christian is running on a typical generic Student Action platform. Heard he was upset about running for AAVP... hm. What does that say about his intentions for the office? He plans to do all the same things that Curtis's directors (not Curtis) are doing right now.