Is this really the kind of discussion you "love?" Come on, it's the crudest interpretation of a bill I've seen this year. The vindictive and vitriolic tone makes it pretty easy to see that Weiner is willing to mis characterize the bill's source and intention in order to mount a personal attack. The fact that already Senator Winston, Kuo, Shams, Jackson, and Du'ong have agreed to co-sponsor the bill undermines Weiner's attempt to attach it to Roxanne Winston.
 

That's a process I typically refer to as "politics." I find these discussions to be far more illuminating on the issues than the sterile "respectful" discourse we're supposed to have, and that the Daily Cal pretends we have. It's in times of stress and conflict that we see the actual beliefs and how they're acted on.

If no one else plays, though, you're right, it won't be all that useful. This is why corporations rarely engage the idiotic rhetoric of their complainers, because they would tip their hand about what they really believe. I fully expect the Senate to do exactly the same thing. But student government is not an independent corporation, and I want to know what it's doing, and what it wants to do.
 

look at Yaman trying to defend his love affair bill with Roxanne.