. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Nap Time!!!

Thursday, September 27, 2007
Brain hurt!

Let's see...
Days after a controversial organization began collecting voter signatures for a ballot measure to change California's winner-take-all primary, a founder of the GOP-backed group says its major players are resigning - and the group will fold - due to lack of funding and support.

...

The measure would have changed the state's winner-take-all means of awarding presidential electoral college votes to a proportional system that would have awarded 53 of the state's 55 electoral votes - one by one - to the popular vote winner of each of the state's 53 congressional districts. The other two electoral votes would have go to the statewide popular vote winner.
I thought we were talking about the general election, and this second paragraph suggests that, but the first is talking about primaries. Was there a completely different ballot measure I hadn't noticed?

posted by Beetle Aurora Drake 9/27/2007 11:22:00 PM #
Comments (0)
. . .
Comments: Post a Comment


. . .