. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Nap Time!!!

Monday, May 14, 2007
Must be more stereotypical

As if you needed any more "Weapons BAAAAD" statements:
"(Education) is the most powerful, positive thing you can do as humans. (But) nuclear weapons are the most destructive, negative thing I can think of," said UC Berkeley junior Amanda Cocking, who is a conservation and resource studies major participating in the fast.
And don't forget...
Francisco Ramos Stierle, a graduate student in the astronomy department, said he feels "phenomenal" after fasting for four days.

"I convert the anxiety of eating into a spiritual energy," Ramos Stierle said. "That's an awesome feeling."
University spokedude Chris Harrington has some advice, though:
We urge them to eat.

posted by Beetle Aurora Drake 5/14/2007 12:04:00 AM #
Comments (1)
. . .
Comments:
Dear Beetle Aurora Drake,

It is not a surprise that the media doesn't do their job correctly. This is the email we sent to the terrible reporter of the Daily Cal. Hopefully the reporter will fix her error soon... (yeah right!)


From: Francisco Ramos Stierle
Date: May 14, 2007 8:56:01 PM PDT
To: tbartlett@dailycal.org
Cc: matt_is_matter@berkeley.edu, dailycalifornian@dailycal.org, Chancellor
Subject: Hi Tamara - Important misunderstanding in your article

Dear sister Tamara,

Many thanks for helping us to spread the word. However, the focus on your article:

www.dailycal.org/sharticle.php?id=25030

is incorrect. In fact, the way your article is written, won't help our cause to stop the proliferation of nukes in the planet.

Free the UC is against the production and proliferation of _nuclear weapons_. We are not against nuclear research. We believe the brilliance of UC students, staff, and faculty would be better applied toward resolving pressing national security concerns by meeting basic needs, such as sustainable energy sources, safe drinking water, and cures for cancer and H.I.V.

As a scientist, I know that the extremely important and successful non-weapons research projects conducted at the labs should be supported and expanded. The labs should be entirely devoted to humanitarian pursuits.

Also when you said:

[Francisco Ramos Stierle, a graduate student in the astronomy department, said he feels “phenomenal” after fasting for four days. I convert the anxiety of eating into a spiritual energy,” Ramos Stierle said. “That’s an awesome feeling.” ]

You might include that we are fasting not because we want to, is because we have to. This is not about Politics, is not about Science, is not about Art, is not about Philosophy. This is about the survival of our species. This is an emergency call. It has nothing to do with "national security", but global security. We are fasting because the UC regents don't listen to us. With this demonstrations, hopefully they will.

That said, I hope you can correct ASAP your article and publish another one where you stress the big misunderstanding.

Attached you will find the latter we send today to the Chancellor. It will help you to understand better the ideals we are defending and also it will help you to become the next news editor.

Many thanks and have a nice day,

If you want to be a rebel, be kind. Human-kind, be both.

Francisco "Pancho" Ramos Stierle

Dear Mr. Chancellor Birgeneau,

We are a group of Berkeley students and alumni who are fasting this week on campus in solidarity with the UC “No More Nukes in Our Name” hunger-strikers. As citizens of the World, we are asking that the UC stop designing, engineering, and manufacturing nuclear bombs. Our aim is to call on the Regents to pass a resolution at their meeting on May 17th to sever ties to the nuclear complex.

We hope that you share our distress about the next generation of nuclear weapons. While we are grateful for what Berkeley has given us for our individual endeavors, we are deeply concerned about what the future may hold for the survival of the human species on this planet. As you know, UC employees designed every nuclear warhead in the US arsenal. These include the B61-11 "bunker busters" currently deployed in the Persian Gulf, with which the US government is threatening Iran. Now, LLNL is designing a new hydrogen bomb (officially, the first new US nuclear weapon since the end of the Cold War) and LANL will start manufacturing nuclear warhead components in 2008.

There has never been a more critical time for the UC Regents to take a principled stand against the US’ nuclear weapons programs. They can withdraw their management of the Los Alamos and Livermore labs, which are the keystone institutions in the US nuclear weapons complex. They could cast the UC's enormous political and intellectual weight on the side of international law and morality, and seize this opportunity to work toward nuclear disarmament. To do otherwise is to continue to provide a false veneer of “academic legitimacy” to the creation and maintenance of weapons that poison communities and endanger the entire World’s magnificent biodiversity.

This clear US government statement that it will continue to rely on nuclear weapons for the foreseeable future sends the wrong message to nations intent on acquiring nuclear weapons. If the United States declares that nuclear weapons are important for its national security, why shouldn't other nations acquire them for their own security? If that happens, everyone's insecurity will be increased. In its heightened level of awareness, the global community is no longer willing to accept unsubstantiated talk and double standards, but demands that authority walk the talk and teach through example rather than words.

UC students have a long history of organizing and taking action on this issue. The multi-campus Coalition to Demilitarize the UC has worked on several fronts to sever the UC's nuclear ties, including writing letters, generating petitions and speaking at Regents meetings. Student governments at multiple campuses, including UC Berkeley, have passed resolutions opposing the UC's ties to the weapon labs, and more are considering similar resolutions.

In light of the immense urgency of the World’s nuclear situation, and the sacrifice we are making these 9 days, we ask you to please write a letter to the Regents endorsing full and complete severance from the nuclear labs. We hope that you will add your strong and engaged voice.

If you are unwilling or unable to do this, we request that you use your leadership abilities to convene a campus-wide dialogue about the aim of education, and the purpose of the national laboratories. In this dialogue, we hope the community will consider and explore whether or not those purposes are compatible.

We will be sitting on campus every day between now and the Regents meeting on May 17th. We would love to discuss these ideas further with you and we’d like to hear your response to our request, so please contact us if you can.

Sincerely,

Some citizens of the World.
 
Post a Comment


. . .