. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Nap Time!!!

Monday, May 21, 2007
Hey, I have a blog!

I forgot. Some stuff about editorials and such. The Daily Cal takes some bold stands today. ...
The regents have argued that because this is a personnel problem, they do not have to share the information with the public.
Are you sure that isn't "they are not allowed to share the information"? I wouldn't have thought that rules allowing confidentiality of personnel matters were there to protect employers rather than employees.
Opponents to the bill argue that the employees are not authorities on financial matters, and thus their input may be inaccurate and cause unnecessary interference. While the employees may not necessarily be financial wizards, it seems unlikely they will advocate any reckless moves that could jeopardize their own crucial pensions.
I think the argument is not that they'd deliberately do things which are bad, but that they won't know what is good or bad. In which case, it doesn't matter what kind of moves they want to advocate.

posted by Beetle Aurora Drake 5/21/2007 08:07:00 PM #
Comments (0)
. . .
Comments: Post a Comment


. . .