Tuesday, October 25, 2005
EditoriallairotidE
Today's editorials make two very bad points. Normally, they go "one bad, one neutral," but today they impress me with both of them.
Essentially, the first claims the BCR-BAMN debate was some kind of model for the kind of discourse that should go on here on campus. I didn't go, but I did go to the BCR-BSTW debate, and that's the kind of discourse that should be reserved for humor value. Nothing useful comes out of it.
On the online voting front, the other editorial makes the intriguing statement:
ASUC is biting off more than it could possibly chew by trying to enfranchise all of its students.
It's an interesting view of the voting process, and not one you would expect from the Daily Cal. Imagine telling voters "we'd like to let you vote, but it's too risky" in an election that actually matters.
. . .
|
. . .
|
