Tuesday, August 30, 2005
Hmm
Here's an interesting factoid about The Daily Planet. While most commentary pieces are titled with the thesis of the commentator, an exception is made for Diebold Veep Dave Byrd's obvious defense of his company, which is titled "Diebold VP Says Company's Machines Recorded Tallies Accurately in Test." (The defense is that all the votes were counted, contrary to implications by others)
Contrast this with the piece he is responding to, from Peter Teichner, titled "How Many Diebolds to Screw Up an Election?" Indeed, contrast it with the other commentary titles in today's paper:
"KPFA Staff Has Refused to Implement Local Station Board's Decisions," and "Library Forum on RFID Revealed Threats to Privacy, Health."
Way to stand up for diversity of thought, O'Malley.
. . .
|
. . .
|
